Council’s forestry approach Debate

Community Wellbeing - Lifestyle & Enjoyment

Option 2

Residents strongly support Option 2, emphasizing that transitioning from commercial to mixed-species forestry will enhance recreational opportunities and the aesthetic appeal of the landscape, making Nelson more attractive for both locals and tourists. They highlight the potential for improved biodiversity, reduced environmental degradation, and the creation of more enjoyable and accessible natural spaces for outdoor activities such as hiking, biking, and paragliding. Many comments also point out the long-term benefits of increased environmental resilience and community well-being through more sustainable land use and the reduction of hazards like fire risk and erosion.

Table of comments:

Point No	Comment
72.3	My strong preference is for option two. Nelson has an extraordinary outdoor adventure offering and transitioning those commercial forests (particularly those that are bordering existing popular areas like Sharlands, the Brook and the Maitai) would boost that offering for locals and tourists alike with a generational opportunity to develop a more ecologically diverse environment. The environmental issues associated with mono-crop forests are well known and I'm sure will be known to the Council.  The hills above Richmond are a highly visible example: exposed rocky hills growing little other than weeds and constantly erosion during rain. I feel strongly that the current commercial forestry approach in Nelson is not a worthwhile use of the currently-forrested land.
77.3	Phase out pine forests and do not replace. Closures are a pain in regard to recreation and pine forests should not be part of the council's remit and they are more trouble than they are worth
92.3	I think option 2 (exit commercial forestry over time) is definitely the right direction for Nelson as the hills surrounding the city  and up the adjacent valleys, are subject to slips and erosion , causing flooding and sedimentation in the valleys which has severe adverse consequences for nelson property and people, as we have seen in the 2022 flooding event.  Commercial forestry in these areas adds to the risks by leaving large amount of slash which have caused significant damage in previous weather events.  Restoring a  canopy, particularly natives,  over time  also enhances our biodiversity, (adding to the halo effect from the Waimarama Brook sanctuary),  is  also a postive response to climate change and  allows greater opportunities for outdoor recreation close to the city. This change would enhance the city overall  and make Nelson a better place to live.
109.1	I strongly support this transition. While ratepayer input will be required in the short/medium term, it seems clear to me that there will be immeasurable long-term benefits for the city residents and recreational groups, plus it will lead to a much healthier Maitai River and Tasman Bay. Looking through a wider environmental lense I have no doubt that it is the right path to take.
119.3	I believe there are many reasons why this is the correct approach for Nelson. The restoration of native forest would help reduce biodiversity loss, sequester carbon (which is absolutely urgently required as one essential strategy to slow clinate change), provide a natural visual backdrop to more parts of Nelson ( the aesthetics of which would benefit tourism), provide healthier recreational opportunities, improve soils and reduce slip danger (which is an obvious major concern with increasingly more extreme weather events).There is the possibility of revenue from recreational us of the restored native forests by tourists.
126.3	Consider just changing the canopy to non-commercial forestry for trees that are immediately visible when looking out from the city to the hills. What sits in behind that could remain commercial forestry.
138.2	I would like to see the Council move to a forestry transition model as recommended by the taskforce. Maintaining a continuous canopy of forests is essential to build more resilient land management systems that have native bush at the heart of them. Transitioning to thriving, biodiverse continuous canopy forests would (eventually) enhance the conservation and recreation value of our forested areas for future generations. This is key to ensuring robust forests of the future that are better placed to help us cope with a changing climate and future catastrophic weather events. They also just look, sound and feel so much healthier than mono-forested areas
181.2	Absolutely stop commercial forestry and invest in developing the areas for recreational use. It is outrageous that Council has been doing it for so long. Nelsons recreation and visual amenity is way more important and the logged areas always look like a war zone, and is so bad for the environment. Council should set an example change your approach. Mixed species would be great and access for recreational use.
223.3	Very important to mitigate future disasters along the Maitai river and tributaries. No one enjoys the mono culture!
228.2	Change it OVER TIME. Dont try to do it all at once, focus on key high public use areas and do them well while keeping some commercial forestry stands to help fund the conversion
231.1	For all of the reasons that Council has already noted, moving away from commercial forestry and re-planting with mixed species indigenous forest will greatly benefit the environment. Fresh water quality and biodiversity will both improve under indigenous forest. Having indigenous forest in our recreational spaces also improves experience for users and is closer to what naturally would have been here before human settlement.
245.3	strongly support option 2. It is a poor look to have a council running a for profit forestry operation that directly and negatively affects the local populations enjoyment and access to the local area.
248.1	As an avid mountain biker and user of the Local trails as well as a Nelson Ratepayer (rental property in Stoke), I have always taken an interest in what happens in regards to the MTB trails under NCC control. It was a shame the council lost control of the forestry ownership along with control of the many MTB trails many of us use for the betterment of our health and social development.Short of buying back or regaining control of the forestry, (most likely not an option), in my opinion the NCC should quietly work away at rebuilding the tracks on Council controlled land over a period of time as they are a major asset to the community not to mention the income they generate for the region. A good example of what they are worth is to compare the Coppermine ride to the Lake Dunstan Trail in Cromwell.It always blows me away at the number of families and young children riding the trails which has to be a positive dynamic in the building of their confidence and developing their social and sporting skills as they grow.Thankyou for the chance to have my say - Regards Jack Currie
252.2	I am flabbergasted that any other approach than this would even be an option to any sane individual with a long term view!  It is clear to me that Nelson's social and commercial value (via tourism) lies in its exceptional natural beauty and close proximity to pristine natural environments.   This is all put at risk by running commercial logging right on our doorstep that scars the landscape, pollutes our rivers, and ruins our natural environment.    But an even bigger issue than that, is protecting our homes and our very lives from the ever-increasing risk of fire in this changing climate.   We know that longer hot, dry spells are coming, and that means elevated fire risk.   We are now seriously at risk of most or all of Nelson going up in flames, and probability tells us the fire will start in a pine forest on the city limits.   Its a complete no-brainer to protect our city by removing the pines and replacing them with a protective barrier of native forest.  Surely the insurance premium savings alone, would cover the cost to do this!
266.3	Increase trail network. Encourage gondola and biking trails
291.3	The proximity of greenspace to the CBD is an awesome feature of Nelson. Given the impact of clear feeling forest at harvest time on waterways and the ecological benefits of maintaining a continuous canopy I think it's any obvious choice to reture land from commercial forestry to support biodiversity and recreational values
297.3	More native trees, more places to play in native forest near Nelson please!
302.2	Usage for recreational users is impacted hugely when trees are felled due to forestry where trails are present. This disruption can cause people to stop walking/cycling due to a lack of other safe (off-roads) areas to do so and therefore negatively impact their health and well-being. Also hundreds of hours of volunteer and non-volunteer are used to build and maintain these trails, which of course are mostly destroyed during the forestry harvest process, causing more resources to be wasted. I would like to see more areas around Nelson not being used for commercial forestry and instead see a permanent forest planted instead.
309.1	This is the only way to help future safe Nelson and the Nelson community from adverse weather events and it is also a better, more financially viable (given status quo is not returning any profit/rate relief to ratepayers) and more environmentally responsible land use for the Nelson owned forestry estate. We are a community full of people the value recreation and the more opportunities we can provide the better. It will provide Nelson with more environmental resilience over time and will actually provide meaningful value to the Nelson community and wider environment.Well done to the taskforce and councillors for taking this on and accepting the taskforce recommendations.
346.6	COUNCILS FORESTRY APPROACH
353.3	Would like to see more native trees planted and less exotic ,ie, pine.  This will also mean that long term the land will be less prone to slips and also support the native bird life.  However, would then like to see NCC build more tracks for walking and MTB.  I have recently moved from Wellington and missing the amazing Town Belt that goes round the city with tracks joining it all up from South coast to Northern suburbs.  By NCC taking over all teh forestry and creating its own 'town belt' you have the opportunity to greatly increase the recreational facilities making Nelson an even better place to live.
369.3	I make this decision with a conservation mindset in that it will be beneficial for the surrounding environment that the commercial forest become native. However if this was to negatively affect the recreational activities of mountain biking, hiking, running and more, then I say we keep it accessible for these activities and do native regeneration
377.1	I live in the Maitai Valley and have seen our beautiful river suffer from the effects of the forestry.  Trees to expensive to harvest due to their close proximity to the river and walkway are left to fall over by themselves. During a dry summer of which we had plenty lately the risk of fires in tinder dry forests is waiting to happen.
390.3	I think we need a continuous canopy of mixed species and one day we could have the Brook Waimarama Sanctuary replicates all through that area.
403.1	wonderful that the council us consudering this. It would make such a difference to the MaitaiValley, for instance.
427.3	the mtb and trails are a great asset for nelson, which would benefit from moving away from a commercial forestry model   Envionmental benefits too
438.2	I feel that is extremely important because of the enhanced myriad recreation opportunities having a diverse canopy would provide versus traditional logging which means that any investment by volunteer groups in recreation infrastructure within that commercial canopy is often obliterated.
447.3	There is an aesthetic issue: pinus radiata and it's destructive harvesting cycle result in a hideous backdrop to our city. What I think we need is the range of colour, shape and size that comes from re-cloaking the hills with native speciesThere is an environmental issue: the run-off from pine forests and the impact of a one species is devastating for water quality, soil quality and diversity of flora and fauna.There is an economic issue: these forests do not pay their wayThere is a resiliency issue: the hills surrounding Nelson are vulnerable to severe rain events of which there have been many in the past 4 decades I have lived here. Pinus radiata forests do not improve the resiliency of the land in these events - native forests do. There are many people who would volunteer to plant natives as my community has done in Murphy St and both the east and west slopes of upper Emano St - we would all help again!
463.2	Yes, Yes, Yes. I commend the Council for seeking change at last. Several generations of my family lived and farmed in the Maitai Valley at Smith's Ford.  I grew up in the valley too, and I am so strongly against the pine plantations in the valley. They have degraded the river and valley badly. Please get rid of commercial forestry ASAP !Continuous cover forest will greatly improve the recreational value of the valley, improve the ability of the forest to slow water run-off in high rainfall events, improve water quality and any extra cost to the Council will be offset by the huge savings being made by eliminating the unseen effects of harvesting, sediment and flooding in the valley and marina.
466.3	very supportive of the long term plan to exit forestry. Much better environment and flow on health benefits to the residents. Pollen is a severe issue that debilitates many people. Ideally all hills surrounding Nelson will be reverted to native bush.
475.3	That’s enabling more council recreation areas.
500.3	I strongly support this option and an exit by Council from commercial forestry. Returning the land to its natural forest state with increased access for recreation would benefit the city environmentally and for social well being.
507.1	This is a move toward protecting houses and land from future flood damage, an improvement in forestry use by people, an improvement visually in the backdrop to our city, and a saving in the cost of cleaning up slash and flood damage. It is the responsible choice for the future.
510.3	I strongly support the Council's proposal.
517.1	Make the trail network in Nelson a higher priority ! The trail network in Nelson has allowed me to improve my riding level and skills to be able to compete at elite world level racing placing me 16th in the world in the Elite Female in 2023. The trail network here is like non other in NZ, these are wold class trails that have people traveling from across NZ and the globe to ride and race on and would be a huge shame if we were to loose the access to them all. Not only that but I work in a mountain bike shop, our clients are those who ride these trails, without the clients I wouldn’t have a job to go too.
519.3	The current situation is very damaging to the environment and is polluting our Maitai river - the only river in Nelson that has summer swimming holes.
583.3	I'd prefer to see a cessation of all forestry harvesting in eyesight of the city. When the hills around Nelson are freshly harvested it is an eyesore and not something that visitors to our town would want to spend time looking at. We will be a much better proposition for visiting when we are a town with easy access to our waterfront surrounded by forest as it existed pre-human arrival.
587.2	I think the city needs to embrace the potential income from adventure sports and recreation mal activities that can be generated with a reliably accessible forest network.
597.3	There are great enironmental benefits from this proposal that will also be aesthetically pleasing for locals and tourists.
597.12	There are great enironmental benefits from this proposal that will also be aesthetically pleasing for locals and tourists.
650.1	It would appear as though the council has never made a profit over the duration of forestry on its land. It would appear to be a liability and problematic for the council.Please plant in natives and/or exotics that in years to come will provide a wonderful backdrop for the city. It will also drastically reduce or remove the hazards associated with forestry.
657.1	a continuous and mostly native forest around Nelson would be a huge improvement for recreational amenity, aesthetics, and enhanced support to the halo-effect from the Brook sanctuary. We have seen multiple times the problems arising from clear-felling of pine forests in terms of the cost and inconvenience to ratepayers from an activity which seeks to provide profits for companies at the expense of the general public and ratepayer.this is another opportunity for Nelson to single itself out as the best living environment in NZ, bar non. Having a city backdrop of native forest and clear rivers would enhance the city well beyond any economic profit or loss equation
670.1	I support the move to continuous canopy, and feel the benefits outweigh the projected costs.  I don't support commercial pine forestry on council land in our city hinterland as clear felling can result in erosion and degradation to water quality and risks during flooding.  As well as reducing those risks there other benefits to having a more continuous forest cover including higher species diversity and improved recreation and aesthetic values in our city hinterland.
675.3	Exit out ASAP as bare hillsides are both ugly and environmentally unsound and detrimental.
677.2	To change the Council owned forestry to mixed, native forest would be wonderful for the environment and in time a beautiful view from the city.
683.1	I support Council being examples of good environmental stewardship and exiting forestry that relies on clear felling harvest. It also leads to recreational gains and more beauty and diversity in our local environment
695.3	I strongly support the planting of a variety of native and exotic trees to replace the pine forests. This will help stabilize our hillsides and reduce forestry slash which can have devastating effects on private/ public land and also our waterways. Forestry slash ends up on our beaches. It is important that our community works toward reducing our carbon emissions and these permanent forests would absorb and store carbon. They also provide recreational opportunities.
734.3	Potentially a land swap could be done with Iwi for access to recreational tracks?
743.1	While we dont currently live in NCC area, we are members of Nelson MTB club and travel to the area every week for kids training and riding. Permanant forest canopy would preserve the efforts of track builders and allow better and more permanant tracks within the region. The exisiting track network is a wonderful resource which is worth travelling to from out of town every week.
773.3	Native forests, biodiversity and non-motorized recreation have way more value to our environment, economy and resiliency of our city than pine logs do.
806.3	The council should plant native species endemic to nelson and enlarge our conservation land to reintroduce native flora and fauna to our area. This will enhance everyone's well being and health.
808.3	this would make for a much more pleasant experience mountain biking which i believe is one of the regions greatest attributes
838.1	Thank you for the opportunity to submit on the Council’s Long Term Plan.
860.1	1.  Pine (Eucalyptus and other fire species) have aromatic, volatile oils which rise in the air and can attract fire from a great distance, depending on the wind conditions.   A few decades age there was a severe drought and a very frightening fire up the Maitai Valley.  Homes had to be abandoned.  It was striking that the native forest remnants in the valleys did not burn.  It is likely that the valley sides were too steep for easy pine planting.  Similarly, there was a severe fire on the west facing slope of Tirohia Marama (aka Grampians) and again pines easily burnt.2.  Logging trucks will eventually not need to use Nile Street and side streets and CBD roads to get to the Port.  This will reduce traffic and congestion.3.  Permanent native forest will sequester Carbon over a long period in contrast to the short commercial logging cycle.
883.3	I'm strongly in favour of surrounding Nelson in forests that are less of fire hazard & have more environmental resilience in rain/ storm events. Part of this plan should include the addition of recreational infrastructure like walking/ mountain biking tracks into the replanted forests. Quality recreational infrastructure is a draw card for visitors, residents & talented people looking to move to Nelson.
887.2	NPHS Te Waipounamu supports the exit of commercial forestry as it provides for a holistic approach to the management of NCC’s native and exotic forests. This option proposes to develop a long-term asset for the community with improved environmental, recreational and social outcomes. Trees are good for our natural environment as they absorb carbon from the atmosphere, support flood mitigation and encourage biodiversity
894.3	Yes, support reindigenising our forests and moving away from pine forestry to native high value forest, it would be best in my opinion to plant natives only or possibly very well researched exotics amongst natives if the experts want that but ideally natives especially on steeper areas and maybe food producing exotics/fruit trees in high use public or designated forgaing areas makes sense to me. Also ensure the changeover of tree types is done bit by bit to avoid higher cost flood or slip events
898.2	As a participant in the Right Tree, Right Place workshops - it is absolutely crucial that Council takes this opportunity to shift away from the current approach which is aggravating soil and erosion loss, creates an unsightly backdrop to the city when harvesting is underway, and does not stack up as a wise investment.  The alternative provides multiple co-benefits, and the opportunity to show leadership, improve biodiversity and climate resilience, and to create a more pleasant backdrop to the wider Nelson City environs.
909.3	The downstream impacts of commercial forestry in the catchments behind our wee city were clear to me as one of many who sought to try and clean up the water and the beaches after the August 2022 rainfall event. The increased sedimentation in our rivers and estuaries from clear-felling practices cause further issues. I also have concerns around what happens when exotic pinus radiata plantations become uneconomic to harvest due to the price of carbon. These monoculture biodiversity 'deserts' are not what we want on the fringes of our city in the future. The proposed continuous canopy mixed species forestry provides a fantastic opportunity to bring a recreational focus to the councils forested areas.
926.3	The inclusion of exotic (not native) species in the replanting should be avoided. Using exotic plants in the replanting will not only look ugly but will lead to spread of non native plants into neighbouring areas and future costs in removing them.
932.3	I wholeheartedly support the transition from commercial forestry to replanting the 600 hectares of council-owned land with a continuous canopy of mixed native species. This decision would have a profound impact on our region's biodiversity, conservation efforts, and recreational appeal, while also sending a powerful message about our commitment to environmental stewardship.The benefits of mixed native forests for biodiversity and conservation are well-documented. Research has shown that these forests support a significantly higher variety of native flora and fauna compared to commercial monoculture plantations. By providing a diverse range of habitats and food sources, mixed native forests create a haven for endangered species and contribute to the overall health of our ecosystems. Moreover, these forests play a vital role in regulating water cycles, preventing soil erosion, and sequestering carbon, thereby helping to mitigate the effects of climate change.In addition to the ecological benefits, transitioning to mixed native forests would greatly enhance Nelson's appeal as a destination for outdoor recreation and eco-tourism. The natural beauty of these forests, with their diverse canopy and understory, would attract both locals and visitors seeking to immerse themselves in nature. Additionally, it's important to note that the impact of this decision extends far beyond the 600 hectares directly managed by the council. By taking this step, the council would send a resounding message about the value we place on biodiversity and our commitment to preserving our natural heritage. This leadership would inspire private landowners, businesses, and the wider community to follow suit, creating a ripple effect that amplifies the positive impact on our environment. As more stakeholders prioritize the restoration of native habitats, we can create a network of thriving, interconnected ecosystems that support a rich tapestry of life.Further, securing long-term recreational access to forestry tracks and trails is crucial for our community, visitors, and events. Mountain biking alone has the potential to generate $48.8M in direct spend for Nelson Tasman, but current access limitations result in a significant loss of $18.5M. Beyond the immediate economic benefits, ensuring access to these natural assets provides immeasurable value to our residents' quality of life and attracts visitors seeking unique outdoor experiences. The proposed long-term agreement between the Council and Ngāti Koata for access to the Maitai Valley is a vital step towards unlocking the full potential of our region's recreational offerings.
939.3	Incorporate the community here. Build trails for EV bikes and walking tracks through these new forested areas. This has great potential as a future tourist destination, thinking 10-15 years ahead. EV trail biking is a growth industry.
961.3	I support food producing trees in public spaces. native trees in ex-forestry areas would be great!
982.3	COUNCIL FORESTRY APPROACHExit commercial forestry
995.3	This will be a great benefit to Nelson city.  Native bush not only looks nicer as the backdrop for the city, but it enables a better interaction with nature and wildlife for all.   Just seeing the destruction of the land from the last round of forestry down the Maitai valley it was pretty obvious that we can do better than that.  Seeing the slips and the runoff during the floods, all the wood slash going down our rivers certainly made the floods worse.  Having a native bush will not only help protect us from run off in the future but will help reconnect Nelson residents and visitors alike with our natural suroundings.  I whole heartedly support this initiative.  Great job bringing it to the forefront.
1018.3	I am an active MTB rider and part of a weekly volunteer track maintenance team for NMBC.  Observing the amazing work done in Codgers area - the new plantings flourishing and the awesome birdsong.  Compare this to the absolute devastation and destroyed habitat for birdlife of the Sharlands clear felling of pines and also the pollution of creeks and rivers.  The Councils preferred option needs more acceleration before it is too late.A policy of protection of access is also very urgent.Look at what this contributes to the Region.
1024.3	I have seen the forestry companies abuse the "health and safety" clause to exclude the public from council land. They have claimed "dangerous operations" while nothing was being done and no workers were on the hill. They also should be held accountable for slash runoff into the streams and rivers. Please maintain access to the top of Barnicoat via glider road. Hundreds if not thousands of Nelsonian and tourist Mtn bikers and Paragliders use the road to enjoy our beautiful region. (They also support the local economy).  The paragliding club also maintains the top and would appreciate the opportunity to guide the planting. we would also appreciate support for future access to Kaka Peak and Fringed Hill in Maitai Valley.When the area below Barnicoat is developed (as marsden valley has been) we need a landing area east of the high power lines. Thank you
1045.1	Firstly, a big thank you to Council for the decision to undertake a review of its 600ha of plantation forestry holdings. Secondly, congratulations to the Right Tree Right Place Taskforce for the thorough and comprehensive review of the council’s forestry holdings. The information, assessments, observations and preferences contained in the various reports and the well-foundered, evidence-based and wide-ranging recommendations should provide a strong strategic basis for Council to proceed with a staged approach to implementing the taskforce’s recommendations. If the recommendations are adopted and implemented over time with extensive community involvement they should result in profound positive benefits on the management of the City’s eastern hinterland and restoration of indigneous biodiversity values and provide increased recreational opportunities for residents and visitors. This in turn should not only provide personal health and social benefits but also considerable long term financial benefits to the wider community and future generations. Council’s options for forestryIn terms of the two options proposed, I strongly support Option 2 – Council’s proposal to change the current approach through exiting commercial forestry over time and to grow a continuous canopy of mixed species and manage the Council land as one area. Related priorities and considerationsTo enable option 2 to proceed it is crucial to quickly prepare a next steps strategy and to allocate adequate funding in the LTP to address the recommendations in the report requiring immediate action (14 & 15), the transition planning and high priority areas for action (16-19). The need to urgently address current issues with invasive pest animals and plants mentioned in several places in the report and is the focus of recommendation 5, will also need to have adequate funding in all years of the LTP. Otherwise, the current biodiversity degradation will continue to increase and become an even more difficult challenge to get on top of. While supporting the concept of mixed forests and having introduced canopy trees in appropriate areas that maybe harvested at some stage in the future, the location of such areas and the species used need to be carefully considered. I note that the report indicates that the most likely locations for consideration of some continued planting of timber species  is some of the more accessible lower slopes in the Roding, which from my knowledge of the eastern hills I concur with. Such considerations include the impacts of providing ground access to such sites, impacts on waterways and establishment of adequate riparian margins, as well as ensuring that they do not contribute to additional wilding pines or other introduced species becoming future pest plants. I suggest that the ‘independent community entity’ included in recommendation 4 have in addition to tangata whenua also have a wide range of perspectives from the community including those with biodiversity expertise, and perhaps also involvement in the Nelson Biodiversity Forum. I also feel that recommendation 6 could be strengthened through the addition of “and biodiversity” after “climate” and in front of the last word “risks” so that it reads …. “and address climate and biodiversity risks”. As I mention in two paragraphs below it is widely accepted that we have a NZ and global biodiversity crisis (as well as a climate crisis). Other relevant considerationsWhile the report provides some background on previous discussions and reports on the development and impacts of forestry there have been significant changes in community attitudes and values as well as in council over the last 40 years or so that I believe are important for council and those who will be dealing with the implementation of the report to bear in mind. There has been increasing acknowledgement that NZ, and the rest of the world, is facing a biodiversity crisis with the loss of indigenous habitats particularly in lowland areas and the degradation of remaining areas through the spread of introduced browsing animals and the reduction in and loss of our special indigenous fauna. The conservation movement has largely moved from saving areas under threats of destruction to restoration of the biodiversity values over a wide range of habitats.  These concerns and the desire to restore degraded areas was a major driver in the establishment of the Nelson Biodiversity Forum and the resulting Biodiversity Strategies developed jointly by Council, the Department of Conservation and other government agencies along with a wide of concerned community organisations and companies. Many existing organisations, such as Forest and Bird and Friends of the Maitai, took the lead in various restoration projects. It was also the key driver for the establishment of the Brook Waimarama Sanctuary Trust and the creation of a predator-free sanctuary in Council’s former water management reserve in the upper Brook Valley. Many trapping groups have been working hard in areas around the sanctuary and in the corridor down the Brook Valley to reduce the numbers of animal pests, such as stoats, possums, weasels and rats, that were killing large numbers of birds. The Brook Waimarama Sanctuary and other conservation projects have shown that there is an “army of conservation volunteers” in our community who are very willing to regularly give their time and energy to enhancing the biodiversity values of our natural areas, including in riparian margins and the often quite rugged eastern hills. Such groups of volunteers have been co-ordinated and assisted by Council over many years now, including in projects under the umbrella of the Council’s Nelson Nature programme. The results from these efforts are now showing up not only when people visit the sanctuary and areas where pest trapping is occurring and supplementary planting is being undertaken, but also in residential areas adjoining the eastern hills with increased sightings of native bird species.     There is no reason why this voluntary army cannot be encouraged and increased to assist with the replanting of areas cleared of exotic forestry in the areas that are to be transitioned to native species. Many retirees are keen to contribute to such projects and many active walkers, runners and mountain bikers are also keen to give back to improve the areas they enjoy visiting and to expanding such areas. It may be useful for those planning the transition from exotic to native species to review the work that the Nelson Biodiversity Forum has undertaken, including the large-scale mapping of potential biodiversity corridors designed to link upland areas with lowland and coastal areas, to see how such retired forestry areas can be incorporated into and enhance such biodiversity corridors. It is pleasing to see that the taskforce report acknowledges that much of the forestry blocks in the Maitai, Marsden and Brook catchments are within the Nelson Nature Halo project around the Brook Waimarama Sanctuary. And in addition that the report contains observations and preferences that they be phased over to indigenous vegetation and provide increased habitat enhancement for birdlife from the sanctuary and additional opportunities for increased recreational activities close to urban areas. This fits very nicely with the Brook Waimarama Sanctuary vision of a biodiversity corridor down the Brook Valley and of improving the habitat outside of the predator-proof fence to enable wildlife that fly over or are relocated outside the fence to have a greater chance of successfully repopulating the adjacent areas of native forests. As a former member of the Forestry Committee during my second term as a councillor, I advocated for a wider range of plantation species, including macrocarpa and hardwood species, to provide a range of timbers that could provide a resource for local furniture and cabinet makers and other possible users of alternative species. However, the prevailing view at the time was that Council needed to focus on increasing the area of Council’s “commercial” exotic forestry plantations to a so-called “sustainable” area of 800ha and continue planting Pinus radiata (as that was what everybody else was planting). This situation was not entirely surprising as the chair of the committee then was the recently retired former NZ Forest Service Conservator of Forests for the Nelson Marlborough area. One of the consequences of this desire to increase the area in plantation forestry was the establishment of some areas of pine plantations in small isolated pockets (particularly in the Maitai catchment) with seemingly no consideration of how the trees would be harvested 25-30 years later and the potential adverse impacts from providing access tracks and the logging techniques on water and soil values. Pines were also planted upstream of Council’s Maitai water supply dam and intakes contrary to its own water supply catchment management practice and the generally accepted best practice throughout the country. So it is very pleasing to read in the taskforce report that such plantings are likely to be transitioned to natives and environmentally damaging practices of clear felling of quite large areas will cease. In 2009, as Chair of Council’s Environment Committee I reworked a discussion paper following encouragement from Mayor Marshall on revegetating the city’s hill backdrop and valleys and establishing corridors which built on a paper initially prepared six years earlier. It seemed to help with the Council purchase of additional land on the Grampians, Brook Valley and the ridge in between the Brook and Maitai valleys that contained the former Dun Mountain railway line that is now part of the popular Coppermine Trail – one of the 23 Great Rides of New Zealand. It was however rather disappointing to see that after the pines were harvested that it was mostly replanted in another crop of pines. The paper is included below for anyone who is interested in reading it. 28 April 2009 The Chairperson and CouncillorsEnvironment Committee VEGETATING THE CITY HILL BACKDROP AND VALLEYS AND ESTABLISHING CORRIDORS Reason for the PaperTo suggest the preparation of a strategy for the re-vegetation of the city’s backdrop hills and valleys and the establishment of multi-purpose corridors. BackgroundOver the past decade or so, Council has been actively re-vegetating some of the hills that form the backdrop to the central city with native and other appropriate species. Areas on the Grampians, Centre of NZ and the Malvern Hills have been particularly targeted. Various individuals and community groups have assisted with this work. A network of tracks which have been popular with walkers, runners and mountain bikers has been established as part of the provision of recreational facilities available to residents and visitors. The western slopes of the Malvern Hills were purchased by Council with the express purpose of securing the backdrop to the CBD and Wood in public ownership. The planting of native species has been happening progressively. A well-used track has been provided, linking the Centre of NZ with Walter’s Bluff. Council now owns the majority of the Grampians, including a valuable native forest remnant on the southern slopes and has been replacing the pine and eucalyptus species with more appropriate ornamental exotic species and natives. The public reaction to the choice of exotic ornamentals indicated that there is considerable support for re-vegetating our hills with native species.  In the Marsden Valley, a combined programme with Council, schools and the community has been controlling old man’s beard and other weed pests and planting additional native trees in the reserve areas. Additional tracks are planned to cater for walkers, runners and mountain bikers, including providing further access to the Bryant Range. Over the past 30 years, Council has been actively acquiring land in the Maitai Valley and establishing a variety of recreational facilities, including the Maitai Walkway and Waahi Taakaro golf course. The Brook Waimarama Sanctuary Trust has been established and is working on implementing its vision for a fenced pest-free sanctuary in the forested headwaters of the Brook catchment where lost species, such as kiwi, saddleback and tuatara, will be able to be re-introduced. It is anticipated that the sanctuary will be a nursery for wildlife that will spread into the adjoining forested areas such as the Maitai Valley, Marsden Valley, Mount Richmond Forest Park and down the Brook Valley corridor into the central city. In August 2003, the Council and the Department of Conservation jointly published the booklet Living Heritage: Growing Native Plants in Nelson which describes eight different lowland ecosystems in the Nelson City area and provides advice on planting and lists of native species appropriate for each ecosystem. This publication is an excellent resource for residents, community groups and others interested in restoring the native vegetation that is unique to Nelson. In May 2007, Council adopted the Nelson Biodiversity Strategy after a collaborative preparation effort by a Council-led inter-agency working group involving more than 20 community organisation over the preceding 2 years, including wider public consultation. The strategy contains 8 principles for biodiversity management, a vision, goals, objectives, methods and priority actions, including the preparation of Biodiversity Action Plans to cover flats, freshwater, coast, sea and hills. The Biodiversity Forum at its most recent meeting on 30 March 2009 adopted 3 action plans for the terrestrial, freshwater and coastal marine environments. It is now a widely accepted principle in biodiversity and conservation reserve management that connected areas are better than unconnected areas and that larger reserves are better than smaller reserves and as a consequence the benefits of connecting reserve areas via wildlife corridors are now widely appreciated. Such corridors are general vegetated to at least some extent to enable the movement of wildlife, particularly birds, in relatively safety and with food sources along the way to help sustain them in journeys between larger areas of suitable habitat. In urban and peri-urban situations such corridors can be for multiple purposes eg they can contain tracks and other facilities for recreational users. In valleys, such corridors can also incorporate esplanade/riparian reserves/strips alongside rivers and streams. The Nelson Biodiversity Strategy included several references to this concept such as Priority Action 16. Connect large and small remnants of native vegetation where appropriate with corridors of replanting, focusing these along the course of streams and rivers and across the city. The VisionTo develop a strategy or policy that has a goals of vegetating with appropriate native and other species, the city backdrop and adjacent valleys and establishes multi-purpose corridors that help to achieve the biodiversity strategy and bring nature back into the urban areas.Preparation of a Re-vegetation and Corridor StrategySuch a strategy could build on what Council has been doing over recent years and provide a more integrated, considered and strategic approach then the present rather ad hoc approach. It could identify backdrop hills and valleys that could be re-vegetated with native and appropriate exotic species. It could also identify possible corridors to link areas of native vegetation. These could be mapped onto large scale aerial photographs. The strategy could in addition to covering land currently owned by Council also include other public lands, land protected by covenants and land that has significant conservation value or potential strategic and/or conservation value that Council or other public agencies may wish to acquire and/or protect. Priorities could be established to help determine Council work programmes, guide community planting projects and reserve acquisition. Council could involve other interested parties including the Biodiversity Forum and provide opportunities for public input. Such a strategy may provide reserve network information that could eventually be incorporated in the Nelson Resource Management Plan, perhaps via structure plans, and into other Council documents such as reserve management plans. BenefitsThese could include:Biodiversity – assisting with implementation of the Nelson Biodiversity Strategy -  enhanced natural values through additional areas of native vegetation and network of wildlife corridors;Community involvement and pride – huge potential to involve the community and to tap into the enthusiasm for planting native trees and shrubs and predator control projects – participants deriving personal satisfaction and community pride from their involvement and the work achieved;Recreation and healthy lifestyle – additional recreational opportunities;Nelson naturally brand – another clean & green element - enhanced backdrop to city and corridor network – a point of difference with other communities;Tourism – additional attractions and facilities for visitors;Employment and training – opportunities for pest control, plant propagation, planting, track development etc;Reduced fire risk – buffer between inflammable vegetation and city;Buffer between people and pollen from pines;Increased certainty with respect to long term planning goals;Substantial contribution to Council’s vision and community outcomes; andPossible opportunities for obtaining carbon credits for re-vegetated and enhanced areas. Recommendation That the Environment Committee consider this paper and, if supportive, set up a joint councillor and staff working group to prepare a draft re-vegetation and corridor strategy.  Derek Shaw
1050.3	Replant with deciduous exotics - there is plenty of native planting and existing native forest. Exotic woodlands provide variety.
1081.3	Please make provision within this approach for the development on specialist areas to support the growth of medicinal plants to support Rongoa Maori; the harvest of plants for cultural projects such as whakairo projects. Please also consider the development of walking tracks, facilities, tramping huts and the allocation of space for youth development programmes, lease to school camp operators etc.
1086.3	It is extremely important to ensure continual long term access to forest areas for recreational activity.Nelson and it’s community are fueled by the great outdoors. A healthy community is fantastic to live in and be a part of. It’s imperative that access continues and the community has shown respect in the past by adhering to closures.
1098.2	I also support the needs of the hang gliding and paragliding community for access thru Council land as needed, and for provision of suitable take-off and landing sites.
1099.3	I would like to see the exit of exit commercial forestry in favor of local recreation and adventure tourism. In particular biking trails need to be preserved and our paragliding sites need both preservation and expansion. The Barnicoat paragliding site is constantly threatened by forestry and this is an iconic part of Nelson. Whatever decision is made i would like to see consideration for paragliding community.
1110.3	Please ensure recreation options remain as they are of huge importance to the region. The access for paragliding, mountain biking and hiking make nelson such a special place.
1112.3	As a hang glider pilot, Barnicoat and the Stoke Hills/Richmond Ranges are a core part of my flying activities.  Recent logging and mono-cultural forests have created unstable land surfaces, as well as an ugly aspect.  Native species, multi-species and a long term strategy, COMBINED with better access to the hills for recreation, will both enhance the environment and living in the region. Mono-species forests with a 30 year cycle are a silly option for this land type; as an investor in commercial forests, this land is highly unlikely to ever be profitable for commercial forestry.
1112.3	As a hang glider pilot, Barnicoat and the Stoke Hills/Richmond Ranges are a core part of my flying activities.  Recent logging and mono-cultural forests have created unstable land surfaces, as well as an ugly aspect.  Native species, multi-species and a long term strategy, COMBINED with better access to the hills for recreation, will both enhance the environment and living in the region. Mono-species forests with a 30 year cycle are a silly option for this land type; as an investor in commercial forests, this land is highly unlikely to ever be profitable for commercial forestry.
1120.3	To whom it may concern,As a member of the THGPC I wish to bring up to attention the importance that having access to Barnicoat take off through Glider Rd has for the paragliding community and other users.Whichever will be the decision in regards to abandon commercial forestry or not please consider all users.Barnicoat Ridge is a very popular destination for Nelsonians and visitors. It would be of great benefit if in case of total closure of Gliders Road we could access the ridge in alternative ways, in example from Silvan Forest.Critical in the future planning and development of the subdivisions at the foot of Barnicoat Range will be also assuring emergency landing area for paragliders (reserve areas of suitable dimensions). Many locals together with a good number of Kiwi and International visiting pilots will be grateful for that.Support in the organising and use of alternative take offs (like former Kaka Hill and Fringe Hill take off) would be very appreciated too.Kind regards,Ramon Lavia
1124.3	Commercial forestry provides short term financial gain at high environmental costs that ultimately are costing the ratepayer - extraction erosion / lack of biodiversity / wilding pines issue. The forestry above Richmond / Stoke should, IMHO be replaced with mixed native and multiple access routes remain open (and be maintained by Council)  to the public for recreational purposes. Barnicoat / Glider Road is a classic example requiring on-going maintenance to allow multiple recreational uses currently being enjoyed to be continued. Mountain bike clubs, Paragliding and Hangliding clubs, walkers and runners heavily use the reserve areas and this needs to be maintained. With respect to paragliding and Hangliding Barnicoat is perhaps the most important readily accessible site in the region for these internationally growing activities. Any forestry activities need to understand the requirement to maintain / improve the launch site and access road and when planting new trees not to adversely impact launch and landing sites.Additional access routes eg. Silvan Road plus direct access walking / mountain biking routes from a secured 'bomb-out' at the foot of Barnicoat should also be sought to allow direct walk up hill / fly back to vehicle as is common throughout Europe. Any development at the base of the hill should take this into consideration as this will be a valuable asset for the region in respect of tourist income.
1130.3	areas close to the CBD should be planted in native species and kept aside for recreational purposes
1157.3	Forestry is too damaging to the environment. Look at the Maitai, it is a life source for our city and has three wonderful swimming holes in summer that we all enjoy. The run-off, silt, erosion and slash continues to damage it.
1181.3	providing that mountain bike tracks are still available - native forests are way better for the environment and mountain biking is the main reason for me moving to Nelson.
1182.2	I believe that more public recreation areas and native bush will be far more beneficial to the community as a whole than the income from commercial plantations. I think that areas should be developed with all forms of recreation in mind including but not limited to hiking, trail running, mountain/e-biking and paragliding/ hang- gliding.
1183.3	As an active member of the hang gliding community who accesses flying site all over the country, I request the following points are considered...Access to Glider Rd and the Barnicoat launch sites is maintained.Council support for the extension of hang glider and paraglider  launch sites to make them safer.Provision of an emergency landing area at the base of the Barnicoat launch.Council permission to access launch sites previously used by the hang glider/paraglider community, but now denied by Ngati Koata.Vehicle access maintained from along Barnicoat Ridge to the launch.Thank you from the New Zealand flyers and their international guests.
1183.3	As an active member of the hang gliding community who accesses flying site all over the country, I request the following points are considered...Access to Glider Rd and the Barnicoat launch sites is maintained.Council support for the extension of hang glider and paraglider  launch sites to make them safer.Provision of an emergency landing area at the base of the Barnicoat launch.Council permission to access launch sites previously used by the hang glider/paraglider community, but now denied by Ngati Koata.Vehicle access maintained from along Barnicoat Ridge to the launch.Thank you from the New Zealand flyers and their international guests.
1183.3	As an active member of the hang gliding community who accesses flying site all over the country, I request the following points are considered...Access to Glider Rd and the Barnicoat launch sites is maintained.Council support for the extension of hang glider and paraglider  launch sites to make them safer.Provision of an emergency landing area at the base of the Barnicoat launch.Council permission to access launch sites previously used by the hang glider/paraglider community, but now denied by Ngati Koata.Vehicle access maintained from along Barnicoat Ridge to the launch.Thank you from the New Zealand flyers and their international guests.
1216.3	We have lost a valuable scallop fishery in Tasman Bay through sedimentation smothering shellfish habitat, most of the sediment resulting from forest harvesting. Forestry harvesting practices in NZ are archaic by international standards resulting in widespread erosion with land and water degradation. Cr Sanson has shown the the economic benefits are marginal.Please exit commercial forestry and find an environmentally sound use for these lands. Plant a mixed canopy forest with recreation facilities like mountain bike and motor bike tracks and charge for use. Nelsons first multi use regional park?
1252.1	This will decrease the fire risk and allow increased access for the mountain biking, walking and paragliding enthusiasts as well as contributing to the establishment of native forest regeneration. I support the continued use of Glider road and access to the Barnicoat launch site as well as establishing an emergency landing site at the base of the hill. Recent housing developments have significantly reduced the landing options and this puts continuing paragliding from Barnicoat in jeopardy. I further support all of the Nelson and Tasman Paragliding and Hangliding club submissions
1257.3	Continued control of public land leased to forestry without the greater enjoyment of the public for recreational use has to stop.  Access to the leased forestry land has been getting worse with forestry incorrectly applying and perhaps doing so deliberately to keep people out 2015 Health and Safety Act, so the lessee can do as they please with out having to manage the public at their cost over the land - the Rodding up behind Barnicoat Hill is a prime example (previous locle foretry allowed access, foreign off shore company purchase no access for New Zelanders).  When raised with council, they wash their hands and say it is down to the forestry company because it is leased to them to manage, not good enough. Return to native and encourage public access once again to what belongs to all New Zealanders for recreationally enjoyment.  Recreational use will draw far more wellbeing gains and dollars into the locale economy than forestry has shown over decades to at best break even, yet risks tremendous devastation to the landscape as we have recently witnessed in the past year or so. The cost for that deviation born by affected landowners and the the council to clean up or rather the rate payer (ie the houseowner again in rate increases - a double whammy for the house owner).
1263.2	Forestry is damaging our coastal ecology the way it is managed in NZ - the silt loads are next level and forestry is a major contributor to this. Restoring council (public) land and reducing the disturbance / impact to ecology and recreation is a win-win.
1278.3	Regenerate to native bush and provide a bush park for the community to enjoy, with some commercial business ventures that can lease the bush for activities etc
1290.3	The private sector is better at running commercial forests than councils are, and a non-commercial forest will enhance the liveability and marketability of our city.
1295.3	This allows for use all the time without restrictions during forestry operations and allows for the development of long term tracks for recreation and improves the environmental impact seen by forestry. Credits can still be gained from native forest.
1295.3	This allows for use all the time without restrictions during forestry operations and allows for the development of long term tracks for recreation and improves the environmental impact seen by forestry. Credits can still be gained from native forest.
1305.3	Great idea from lots of point of view (and especially a flood mitigation point of view). I also look across the Cook Strait and see the amazing work Wellington has done to enhance their native bird populations, using the halo effect of Zealandia (and trapping). We have our own Waimarama sanctuary and if we provide good habitat by converting the pine plantations and implement the 2022 Urban Greening Plan, we might be able to create an amazing city of native birds. These are the kind of treasures that will become more valuable with time.
1313.2	although forestry is a large employer in the region, pine trees or barren hills doesn’t align with the 100% Pure NZ image very well
1324.3	This is a no brainer.  We saw a huge amount of forestry slash in our rivers and sea after the August 2022 floods.  I helped clear tahunanui beach, most of that debris was forestry slash.  We also need to improve our biodiversity.  A dream would be to have the city surrounded by bush like we have in the Brook Waimārama Sanctuary.  That would be really special.
1329.3	This needs to happen as it has been very unsuccessful and a blight on council and during flood events is devastating.I also support developing the spaces in Marsden valley for recreational use.Barnicoat is one of New Zealand's premier paragliding sites i support more development of that site often people congregate at the take off a lovely grassed area for walkers MTBers and pilots all enjoying one of the only places you can enjoy the view I also support trees being planted which support the sport on launch.I also support a landing space being available as land is developed and reserve places are created with trees and plantings which support the sport
1333.3	I strongly support the council transitioning away from commercial forestry. Although council commercial forests represent only a small percentage of commercial forests they are strategically placed being close to urban areas and sensitive, unique ecological areas such as the mineral belt. Permanet forests offer some protection from climate change risks, reducing flooding and fire hazards. There are also considerable recreational and aesrthetic advantages.     Assuming the council proceeds with option there are significant opportunities to partner with community groups which would offer both financial and social rewards.
1365.3	Recreation value has more value than Forestry.
1366.3	forestry generally is an eyesore, especially tge areas tgat are close ti town. It decreases the value of natural beauty which impacts the desirability of thd region and recreation suffers and is degraded. Recreation clse to the town shoujd be prioritised ( such as mountain biking, walking, running ) This will add value to residents and visitors alike. Nelson could position itself as leaded in the space of environmental restoration.
1367.3	Definitely need to get out of supporting commercial forestry.  So many problems caused by slash. Not just to people's properties but also dangers to water users (like myself), both to locals and to tourists.  Along with many others  volunteered at beach clean ups clearing up what was 90% slash.  Volunteers should not have to sort out problems caused by commercial entities.
1369.3	Athletics Nelson Inc is the only Athletics New Zealand registered senior club promoting running and walking in the Nelson Tasman area. It caters for athletes from children through to Masters and offers year-round opportunities for road, cross country, track and field, mountain and trail running.  Trail running in the hills to the north, east and south of the city is currently experiencing a marked increase in popularity both for recreational and training runs and competitive events. The Club and other event organisers utilize the existing network of tracks on Council and private land and are keen to provide trail runners with new track options for events. We support Option 2 for Council’s approach contained in the Draft NCC LTP 2024-2034. The proposed exit of commercial forestry activities in favour of transitioning to a continuous canopy of mixed species and managing all the Council-owned forests as one area will have considerable long term environmental, social, recreational and financial benefits to the city.  These include: Safer areas for recreational users, including runners and walkers, as the fire risk in dry periods should be much reduced by the removal of inflammable pine plantations and their replacement with less inflammable native and exotic species; Hopefully, it will result in far less time when areas with Council plantations are closed to recreational activities, thus preventing access to recreational areas beyond the current plantation forests; Opportunities to add to the current network of tracks for recreational activities which, in turn, will enhance Nelson’s reputation as a great place to visit for trail running, mountain biking and walking activities and events;  A significant reduction in adverse health effects on those people who suffer from the effects of pine pollen as a result of the removal of pine plantations; A more attractive environment for recreational activities when exotic plantations are replaced with native and a mix of other species in some areas; No more closures of vital recreational areas to allow for the harvesting of pine plantations;  The avoidance of unsightly areas associated with harvesting - slash, stumps, access roads and log handling sites - and the impacts on soil disturbance, erosion and siltation in our streams and rivers in the eastern hills and valleys;   Substantially providing increased options for residents to enjoy the personal health benefits of physical exercise.
1379.3	Strongly support option 2.
1413.2	This is a great idea. Preferably native species all along the hills from Fringe Hill to Sylvan forest. The existing road infrastructure is important for the paragliding and hang gliding club to access the Barnicoat take off site, so hopefully any logging of existing pinus radiata would not adversely affect access.
1433.3	Council’s forestry approachTBCA supports Option 2 – change our approach, exit commercial forestry over time and grow a continuous canopy of mixed species Nelson’s backdrop of low, north-facing hills provides a wonderful opportunity for development as a recreational space with high conservation and biodiversity values. A mix of native and exotic tree species would give stable forest cover while also reducing the risk of sedimentation, which is an inevitable feature of plantation forestry.
1437.3	i do not support our reliance on pine forestry and would like to see the hills return to native bush with recreation options doe residents.
1438.3	Leave commercial forestry in the private sector. Mixed species on council land provide a better canopy, more resilience and more attractive to look at.
1450.2	I support the planting of native and exotic trees to enhance the area and to encourage more recreational use if it is possible to ensure plantings around the existing paragliding & hang gliding launch/landing area are of a suitable distance away and height to allow safe operations to continue from the area.  I would consider vehicle access to the top of Barnicoat  important as I believe it benefits multiple users of the area.
1479.3	i like the idea of recreational access to mixed species forest near the city fringes. Acquiring most of Kaka Valley could be considered for this.
1494.2	Support Option 2 - Exit commercial forestry over time and grow a continuous canopy of mixed species.
1495.1	Forest & Bird supports Option 2 – Exit commercial forestry.Forest & Bird support the implementation of the Right Tree Right Place Taskforce recommendations.Although Option 2 is presented as a more expensive option, we would argue that there are externalized costs not accounted for in continuing with commercial forestry and there are clear benefits in transitioning away from commercial forestry.Externalised costs include erosion and sedimentation impacts, fire risk, and wilding conifer risk.Erosion & sedimentation.Forest & Bird see sedimentation as the second highest risk to biodiversity in the Nelson region after climate change. This is because of the impact of sedimentation on our coastal marine environment. A slip on a steep clear-felled slope in the Maitai Valley during the 2022 weather event damaged Nelson’s water supply, necessitating an expensive repair.Indigenous forest reduces the chance of slips and erosion. A study conducted in Marlborough by GNS Science after the 2022 weather event which resulted in severe erosion, found that “Harvest Forest and exotic forest makes up around about 18% of the land cover (in 2021), yet it contributed something in the order of 65% of the landslides”. And “Data showed that indigenous forest made up close to 50% of the land area, yet it's only contributing maybe 5% of the landslides.”11 Hart, M. (2023, Jul 25). ‘The problem is the forestry’: Human activity a ‘dominat factor’ in Marlborough Sounds Slips. Stuff. Retrieved from: https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/local-democracy-reporting/132579430/the-problem-is-the-forestry-human-activity-a-dominant-factor-in-marlborough-sounds-slipsFire risk Exotic forestry has a greater fire risk than indigenous forests. Fire risk will increase with our warming climate. Fire risk also reduces opportunities for public recreation in council’s public reserves when they are closed due to fire risk. In addition, this has an impact upon summer tourism and the economy.Benefits to transitioning away from commercial forestry.•Reduced erosion and sedimentation.•Long term Biodiversity benefits from transition to indigenous forest.•Reduced fire risk and greater year-round public recreational access.•Future ETS income from eligible indigenous afforestation.